Case study (anonymised)
Building a Living Integrity Record from Multi-Vendor Data
Historical inspection and survey data was difficult to access and reconcile. Engineering teams spent significant time locating, validating, and reinterpreting data before assessments could even begin.
- Evidence packs designed for review forums
- Assumptions and thresholds recorded
- Outputs versioned for handover
Challenge
Historical inspection and survey data was difficult to access and reconcile. Engineering teams spent significant time locating, validating, and reinterpreting data before assessments could even begin.
Common failure mode
Decisions get made on screenshots and ad-hoc spreadsheets, with limited traceability back to source.
What “good” looks like
A pack you can rerun: inputs, checks, assumptions, change log, and publishable outputs.
Inputs and context
Representative sources used during delivery.
Approach
Typical delivery steps, designed to be repeatable and reviewable.
01Design, inspection, survey, and operational data centralized into a controlled directory
02Datasets versioned, spatially aligned, and preserved across inspection cycles
03Integrity workflows standardized and made repeatable across the organization
Outcomes
Observable outcomes, without over-claiming.
Significant reduction in engineering analysis time and third-party service costs
Faster handover and assurance processes between teams
Improved long-term integrity planning and decision continuity
Next step
Bring one asset, one decision, and one delivery deadline. We’ll show what an evidence pack looks like.
Request a consultationBrowse modulesWant a similar outcome?
Share your current sources and constraints. We’ll suggest a conservative first step focused on traceability and output quality.